I. “Author of the psalm” - The psalm purports to have been written by David, and there is no reason to doubt that it was composed by him. There is no tradition to the contrary, and there is nothing in the psalm inconsistent with such a supposition.
II. “The title” - The psalm is said in the title to be designed “to bring to remembrance.” The same title occurs in Psalms 70:1-5, though there is no resemblance between the two, except that they both have reference to the attempts and purposes of the enemies of David, and to trials in different forms which had come from them. The Latin Vulgate renders this: “A Psalm of David, for remembrance concerning the Sabbath.” The Septuagint renders it in the same manner. The Arabic: In which there is a mention of the sabbath.” Whence these allusions to the sabbath were derived is unknown, as there is nothing in the Hebrew corresponding with them. The Aramaic Paraphrase has prefixed, “For a good memorial concerning Israel.” The Hebrew term used - להזכיר lehazekiyr - means simply “for bringing to remembrance,” or for reminding. The meaning is, that it is a record for the purpose of “reminding;” that is, of keeping the “remembrance” of something which had occurred in his own experience, and which might be useful to himself or to others; the record of some valuable lessons which had been learned from what he had experienced in the trials referred to. Compare Genesis 40:14; 1 Kings 17:18; Ezekiel 21:24. Gesenius (Lexicon) renders it, “To bring to remembrance, sc., oneself with God.” Grotius says of it, “This psalm is designed to inculcate the perpetual remembrance of David and his sin, and of the pardon that was granted.” There can be no doubt that the psalm had this design of making a permanent record of an important event in the life of the author, or of his “experience” in a time of great calamity; but why this title was affixed only to this psalm and to Psalms 70:1-5 is wholly unknown. There are many other psalms to which, it would seem, the title might have been prefixed with equal propriety, as containing important reminiscences of trials, and of religious experience under those trials.
III. “Occasion of the psalm” - The particular time or occasion on which the psalm was composed is unknown. There are no recorded events in the life of David to which this psalm would be “particularly” applicable, though, in a life of trial and suffering such as his was, there can be no doubt that there may have been many such occasions. It is impossible now, however, to fix the exact time or occasion with any degree of accuracy or probability. What is known is, that it was with reference to sickness Psalms 38:3-8, Psalms 38:10-11, and to the neglect which was evinced, and the cruel treatment which he received, in sickness Psalms 38:11-12, Psalms 38:19-20.
IV. The contents of the psalm.
(1) The psalm describes the condition of one who was suffering from “sickness,” Psalms 38:2-3, Psalms 38:5,Psalms 38:7-8, Psalms 38:10-11. Some have supposed that this is merely “figurative” language, and that it is designed to represent calamity, trouble, sorrow, heavily pressing upon him as if he were sick; others have supposed that it is intended to refer, not to David, but to the people of Israel as afflicted and persecuted, represented under the image of one suffering from disease; but the most natural and obvious interpretation is to regard it as a literal description of one who was suffering under some form of disease. There were doubtless occasions in the long life of David when this actually occurred; and there are occasions in the lives of the people of God of a similar kind, sufficiently numerous to make it proper that an inspired record of the experience of a good man thus suffering should be preserved, as an example of the proper spirit to be manifested in sickness. What was the “character” or “nature” of that sickness may appear in the examination of the particular expressions in the record.
(2) The condition of the sufferer as aggravated by two things:
(a) By the neglect of his friends - by their turning away from him in his trials, Psalms 38:11;
(b) By the efforts of his enemies - taking advantage of his sickness, and bringing against him accusations which he was not then able to meet, Psalms 38:12.
(3) He himself traces all these trials, arising either from his disease or from the attacks of his enemies, to his own sins, and regards them all as the expression of the divine displeasure against his transgressions, Psalms 38:3-4, Psalms 38:6,Psalms 38:18. The effect of his suffering from sickness was to bring his sins to remembrance - an effect not uncommon, and, under the Providence of God, not undesigned - though he may have erred, as the afflicted often do, in supposing that his sickness was a “specific punishment” for sin, or was intended to correct him for some “particular” transgression.
(4) His own calmness and meekness in respect to the charges which, amid his other trials, his enemies brought against him, Psalms 38:13-14. He says that he was like a deaf man that did not hear, and like a mute man that did not open his mouth. He “seemed” not to hear anything that was said to his disadvantage, and he was as silent as though he had been mute.
(5) His earnest prayer for the interposition of God in these circumstances of sickness and trial, Psalms 38:15-22. He says that his only help is in God, Psalms 38:15; he prays that God will not allow his enemies to triumph over him, Psalms 38:16; he says that he is ready to halt, or that his strength is nearly exhausted, and he fears that his patience will utterly give way, Psalms 38:17; he says that he will confess all his sin, Psalms 38:18; he refers to the fact that his enemies are “lively,” and are on the alert for his fall, Psalms 38:19-20; and in view of all this, he earnestly calls on God to save him, Psalms 38:21-22.
There is a striking resemblance between this psalm and Psalms 6:1-10, in the general structure, and in some of the particular expressions. Both appear to have been composed in a time of sickness, though not probably in the same sickness; and both express substantially the same feelings. The forty-first psalm, also, appears to have been composed on a similar occasion. In a revelation adapted to mankind, and designed to be applicable in its instructions and promises to the various conditions in which men are placed on the earth, it was to be presumed that there would be a not unfrequent reference to the sick bed - to the trials on a couch of languishing. And in an inspired book of “devotion,” like the Book of Psalms, designed to illustrate the nature of piety in the various and diversified situations of life, the object of a revelation could not be fully accomplished without an illustration of the feelings of piety in the time of sickness, and in the prospect of death - for such scenes must occur in the world, and it is eminently in such scenes that we desire to know what is the proper feeling to be cherished; what true religion is at such a time; what it will do to sustain and comfort the soul.
The Book of Psalms, therefore, would not have been complete without such an illustration of the nature of piety; and hence, it was every way probable that psalms like this would be composed, and every way improbable that no such psalms would be found in a book of inspired devotion. It seems to me, therefore, unnatural, and not demanded by any proper views of interpretation, to regard this psalm, and the other similar psalms, as DeWette, Hengstenberg, Rosenmuller and others do, and as the Aramaic Paraphrase and Jarchi do, as descriptive of “general calamity, Ungluck;” or of calamity coming upon “a people” - rather than a particular affliction in the form of sickness coming upon “an individual.” The great value of the book of Psalms consists in the fact that it furnishes illustrations of the nature and power of true religion in all the varied circumstances of the lives of individual friends of God.