“The Jews,” Jerome says, “say that these things are to be fulfilled under Gog; others that they were accomplished in part, in the times of the Macedonians, Egyptians, and other nations. We, leaving the truth of the time to the judgment of the Lord, would explain what is written.” Eusebius points out that it cannot be said to have been fulfilled under Antiochus Epiphanes; “If any think that these things are, then let him consider again and again, whether he can refer the rest of the prophecy also to the times of Antiochus; as, that ‘the feet of the Lord stood on the mount of Olives’ Zechariah 14:4, that ‘the Lord in that day’ Zechariah 14:9, became ‘king over the whole earth;’ and so, as to the rest of the prophecy.” And although more was fulfilled in the last siege by the Romans, still those who would explain it solely of this, are obliged to mingle explanations partly literal, as that Jerusalem should be the earthly Jerusalem, which was destroyed, partly metaphorical, as to the mount of Olives, its division into two parts etc. It seems then probable that, like the kindred prophecy of Joel Joel 2:30; Joel 3:18, it relates chiefly to the time of the end, and that as our Lord unites the destruction of Jerusalem with His Coming in the Day of Judgment, so here are united that first destruction with the last rebellion of man, in the times of antichrist. Since then much or most may be yet future, it seems safer, as Jerome suggests, to explain the prophet’s symbolic language, leaving the times of the fulfillment to Him, in whose hands they are.