Yea, I have — i.e., on the contrary, so far from returning evil for good, I have returned good for evil. With allusion, there can be little doubt, to the incidents referred to in the last Note. From metrical reasons, and also to avoid the abruptness of the change of construction, Ewald conjectures that two clauses have dropped out of the text, and restores as follows —
“If I have rewarded evil unto him that dealt friendly with me
(And cunning unto him that was at peace with me,
Yea, if I have not rewarded his soul with good).
And delivered him that without cause is my enemy.”
Milton’s translation gives yet another colour to the passage —
“If I have wrought
Ill to him that meant me peace,
Or to him have rendered less,
And not freed my foe for nought.”
The conjecture of a corruption of the text is supported by the rendering of the LXX. and Vulg., and a very slight change gives the probable rendering: “If I have returned evil to him that dealt friendly with me, and injured my enemy without cause.”