MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.— Matthew 24:36-51
The uncertainty of the end.—We ought to know the season, we cannot know the moment, of the “appearing” of Christ. So the Saviour teaches us here. “Of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the Son Himself,” in a sense (Matthew 24:36). How will the appearing of Christ, in consequence, come on the world? How should the thought of it, meanwhile, tell on the church?
I. How it will come on the world.—It will come on it, first, while men, as a rule, are thinking of everything else. The story of Noah and the deluge is an illustration of this. Coming on men as that did in almost total disbelief of his warnings (we read of no one outside his own family believing in them at all) it found the men of that day thinking of everything else. They were full of engagements which all took for granted that there was nothing to interrupt them at hand (Matthew 24:38-39; cf. also Luke 17:28, “they planted, they builded”). And they were doing this to the very verge of the visitation itself. They did not believe in the flood till they found it had come, and never thought of it until it swept them away. Even so would it be, the Saviour declares here, with regard to His “coming.” What had been true of the type would be true of the antitype also. What had happened in Noah’s day would happen also in His. Not till that “door,” also, was being “shut” (Genesis 7:16; Matthew 25:10) would men see it was open. That day when it comes will find men, also, as they are to remain. Men will be found differing then, as they differ now, about the things of the kingdom. Although as a rule then they will not be thinking of the approaching appearing of Christ, there will be some among them who do. There will be some, then, in short, who “love His appearing,” although most others do not. These differing classes, also, will be found at that time, even as they are now, much mingled together. Just as now, in one “field” there may be “two men,” or, now, at “one mill” there may be “two women,” who are as far asunder in heart on this question of Christ’s appearing as they are near together in person, so will it also be then. But so, on the other hand, on that day of days, it will not continue to be any longer. That day, on the contrary, shall for ever separate these “unequally yoked” ones. And shall separate them also, be it further observed, to wholly separate lots. Those who are “left” are not left to be saved! Only those “taken” are taken to life. There is no intermingling, there is no re-arrangement, after that date!
II. How the knowledge of these things should tell on the church.—How it should tell on them, first, as to what they should do. They should use the information thus given them about the end in order to be prepared for it when it comes. It was even so, of course, that in regard to all things of importance, all men of sense would proceed. No householder, e.g., who had received information as to the time when the housebreaker intended to visit him, would fail to make use of it in getting thoroughly prepared for his visit (Matthew 24:43). Even so must they act in regard to that day which was to “come as a thief.” Having been so expressly told this they must make use of this knowledge so as to be “prepared” for that day. And since it might come any day they must be prepared for it every day, as the only way to make sure (Matthew 24:44). This same knowledge should show them, next, why they ought to do thus. They ought to do so, on the one hand, as a question of duty. The knowledge thus imparted to them, and the capacity bestowed on them by means of which they were enabled to realise both its importance and truth, were not things given them for their own advantage alone. They were more than a privilege. They were also a trust. And they were bound, therefore, to use these things for the benefit of others as well (Matthew 24:45; 1 Peter 4:10). And nothing, they might rely on it, would be more pleasing to their Master, and therefore more “blessed” for them, than to be found doing so at the end. Let them be always “ready,” therefore, if they would be ever doing what was best for themselves (Matthew 24:46-47). Let them think of this also, on the other hand, even as a question of life. This duty was one which could only be neglected by them at their uttermost peril. Not thus to do was to do the opposite in effect. Not to impart thus to others was in practice to rob them. Not to argue from the uncertainty of the hour of Christ’s coming in the way of obedience was to go in the way of rebellion (Matthew 24:48). It were hard to say, therefore, whether there was more of treachery or of presumption in such conduct; or anything more truly deserving the worst doom of which we hear in God’s Word. It would almost seem, in a word, as though not to be hoping for, and so not to be ready for, the appearing of Christ, was to be in a position in which we can expect nothing from it but ill.
How worse than valueless are the predictions of men!—Practically the voice of the antediluvian world was a prophecy in opposition to the preaching of Noah. The like is true of the voice of the world since, in regard to the preaching of Christ. We know what became of that earlier “voice.” We know what is to become of the other. The louder it cries, and the longer it lasts, and the more “prophets” it comes from, only the more manifest, at the last day, will be its falseness and shame. The revelation of this truth is almost as old as our race (Jude 1:14-15; see also Romans 3:4; Romans 3:19).
HOMILIES ON THE VERSES
Matthew 24:37-39. The Flood.—
I. How universal the doom.
II. How marvellous the general apathy.
III. Safety only in the ark.
IV. Christ our ark.—J. C. Gray.
Matthew 24:40-41. Diversity in character.—The world’s work will be going on then as now; there is also the thought of a real separation in this life beneath an external sameness.—A. Carr, M.A.
Matthew 24:42. Christian watching.—I. In Christian watching there is implied a vigorous exercise of a Christian conscience.—
1. When we wish to quicken and increase the power of conscience, we must do so by teaching it to be more and more keen in perception. Conscience must stand before us, as a watcher on a ship stands, guiding the bark of the soul through the wild waves and the thick darkness of this deep night of life, and crying out to us, from moment to moment, in the voice of the great Lord whose echo it is, “What I say unto you I say unto all, Watch.”
2. But conscience requires also to be wide in its range of vision—it must omit nothing. It must not fret over trifles, but it must not leave them out; it must recollect, it must learn increasingly to recollect, that attention to the little things of every day is an element in that attitude of a Christian which the Lord calls watching.
3. You must exercise conscience to assist you in wise decision.
4. Conscience must also, finally and above all things, be peremptory in command. Conscience may be wrong, it may make mistakes, but it must never be disobeyed. To disobey conscience is to commit the last disloyalty—it is to learn to be untrue to yourselves.
5. Conscience needs illumination It needs the illumination that comes from prayer, from the Scripture, from the wise advice of patient and experienced friends.
6. It needs more, it needs reinforcement; it needs the presence of the Lord of conscience; it needs to feed upon the power of Christ.
II. There is another point in Christian watching which I must note. It is not only by the exercise of conscience, it is by a patient practice of thoughtfulness.—To take thought and make it pass into a permanent form; to lay hold upon will and make it act in one definite direction;—to do that is to set the life sweeping onward, like a resistless current, in one direction; it is to place the whole soul in one steady attitude; and this definite directing of the current of life, and this steady fixing of the attitude of soul—this and nothing else is what our blessed Redeemer calls watching.—W. J. Knox-Little, M.A.
Watching for the Lord’s coming.—The idea is, Ye know not whether the day or hour of the Lord’s coming be characterised by the quality of comparative immediacy or of comparative remoteness. And yet the Lord had told His disciples that many events would occur before this glorious appearing. Wherein, then, the consistency of the injunction of this verse? It is found in a combination of two assumptions.
1. That the Lord was speaking, not merely to and for His Apostles, but to and for His disciples in all places and times.
2. That He took a broad view of spiritual realities, and the bearing of the great events connected with His kingdom on individual souls. So far as the soul’s real interests, and its great duties, are concerned, it is of no real moment whether it shall remain incarnate till the coming of the Lord, or be “absent from the body” long before that event. Spiritual watchfulness in either case is equally needed.—J. Morison, D.D.
Matthew 24:43-44. The uncertainty of life the great reason for holiness.—
I. The character of the existing dispensation would be altogether changed were we enabled to foresee whatever could happen.—It would no longer be a dispensation of faith, but a dispensation of sight. We find it intensely difficult in our ignorance to submit ourselves to God, in whose hands we are. What would it be if we had acquaintance with the future, and so were in a measure independent; and could make our plans with certainty as to their issue. The wife would be a widow while her husband lived, the child would be an orphan while yet blessed with parents, if the funeral were foreknown and the day of separation clearly revealed.
II. It is practically of very little importance whether we can give satisfactory reasons why the future should be hidden, and for the declaration that the unveiling it would produce far greater preparedness for the termination of life. It might, on the whole, be advantageous, or it might on the whole be disastrous, that the day of death should be known; but the arrangement to which we are to conform is one in which the day is absolutely unknown; and it must be our business rather to labour at acting agreeably to the circumstances in which we are placed, than to determine what effect would be wrought were those circumstances changed.—H. Melvill, B.D.
Matthew 24:45-51. The faithful servant and the wicked one.—
I. Their opposite spirit.—The one waits for the coming of the Lord; the other puts no faith in that coming.
II. Their acts.—The one takes care of the household’s nourishment; the other makes himself a despotic lord, who abuses the faithful, and wastes the goods of the house in riotous living.
III. Their recompense.—Blessed and miserable surprise at the advent of the Lord. The one is elevated to the highest dignity, the other is condemned and destroyed on the spot.—J. P. Lange, D.D.
Matthew 24:45-47. The Lord’s true steward.—
I. Characteristics.
1. Faithful.—To his Lord. To the end (Matthew 24:46).
2. Wise or prudent, for himself, and in relation to those under his care. The “word in the Greek is that which ethical writers had used to express the moral wisdom which adapts means to ends, as contrasted with the wisdom of pure contemplation, on the one hand, or technical skill on the other” (Plumptre).
II. Function.—“To give them meat (their food, R.V.) in due season.” The daily or monthly allowance. “This imagery, drawn from a large Roman estate, has given rise to the oft-recurring thought of the stewardship of the Apostles and ministers of Christ.” 1 Corinthians 4:1; Titus 1:7 (Cambridge Bible for Schools). “There is an art, as it were, of spiritual dietetics, which requires tact and discernment as well as faithfulness. The wise servant will seek to discover not only the right kind of food, but the right season for giving it” (Plumptre).
III. Reward.—“He will set him over all that he hath” (R.V.); “thus conferring upon him the highest honour and reward of which he is susceptible” (Morison).—H. M. Booth.
Matthew 24:48-51. The unfaithful steward.—
I. His conduct.
1. Presumptuous.—“My Lord delayeth His coming.”
2. Self-assertive.—“Smite his fellow-servants.” More than neglect; “abusing them in the spirit of a petty tyrant” (Morison).
3. Self-indulgent.—“Eat and drink with the drunken.”
II. His punishment.
1. Absolutely certain.—“Shall come.” “Our putting off the thoughts of Christ’s coming will not put off His coming” (M. Henry).
2. Surprisingly sudden.—“In a day when he looketh not for Him.”
3. Terribly severe (Matthew 24:51). “Some have felt surprised that our Lord did not shrink from the horror of the word (‘cut him asunder’). Ah! but it was the horror of the thing which He dreaded, and wished to avert. It was the infinite pity of His heart that led Him to use a word which might prove the very strongest deterrent. Besides, how significant it is! Think of whom He is speaking,—servants set over His household to give food in due season, who, instead of doing this, maltreat their fellow-servants and ruin themselves with excess. Think of the duplicity of such conduct. By office in the church, ‘exalted unto heaven’; by practice, ‘brought down to hell’! That unnatural combination cannot last. These monsters with two faces and one black heart cannot be tolerated in the universe of God. They shall be ‘cut asunder’; and then it will appear which of the two faces really belongs to the man” (Expositor’s Bible).—H. M Booth.