And when the prophet that brought him back from the way heard thereof.
On the character of the old prophet of Bethel
The most careful review of this man’s conduct does not make it easy to comprehend it; nor, indeed, do we know enough about him to satisfy us in pronouncing decidedly on the subject. Still there are circumstances in his history which do throw light on certain points of his character; and give them sufficient distinctness for us to apprehend a drift in them, and see an instruction which they convey to us. The first circumstance I would notice, is what we find in the twenty-third chapter of the Second Book of Kings; where we read, at the eighteenth verse, that the relics of him who was buried by the side of the man of God, are stated to be “the bones of the prophet that came out of Samaria.” He was originally of Samaria, the capital of his country; and now, in his old age, we find him removed to Bethel; the very mount of corruption, the temple of sacrilege, the very throne and stronghold of that “son of Nebat,” who had so fearfully “made Israel to sin.” Wherefore was he there? Had he gone there in grief and dismay at the doings of his prince, to remonstrate against and correct them? Had he gone, in jealousy of zeal and affection for the honour of his God and his Church? Alas! no; he could have gone with no such wish or object as this, or it would not have required God’s special mission of one of His prophets from Judah, to declare the violated truth before king, and priests, and people at Bethel! It is too clear that the old prophet must have been, at least, a consenting party to the doings which had made Israel an abomination in the sight of God. He must have even preferred the new order of things under this spiritual revolution of Jeroboam, or he need not have remained where they must day after day have done violence to his habits, and shocked his principles of religion.
1. That the burden of causing this misery and sin was mainly to be laid to the old prophet’s charge, there can be no doubt whatever. Although the delinquency of the man of God was great, the guilt of his aged brother was greater far; the former, indeed, yielded unjustifiably to temptation, but the latter assumed a part fit only for the malice of Satan himself. Our blessed Lord spoke with His characteristic monitory expression, when He joined the character of “a liar and a murderer” together; and pointed out to certain of the Jews that their “father the devil” had been “a destroyer from the beginning, because he abode not in the truth, and there was no truth in him.”
2. The next thing we should observe, is the singular faith and courage of his conduct, after he had been forced to announce his own victim’s punishment, and after the result of his treachery had broken, in its dreadful reality, upon his mind. Compunction and remorse evidently seized upon his mind, when he set forth upon the sorrowful errand of bringing back to an honoured burial, and a deep mourning, the man whom he had hurried to this untimely end. He saw and acknowledged the finger of God in this thing.
3. Moreover, it is evident that he must by this time have become touched with the truths which God had proclaimed by the mouth of His servant, and the richly earned vengeance in store for the crying sins of Israel. For, according to the words of our text, he solemnly forewarned his sons of the certain accomplishment of “the saying which was cried by the word of the Lord against the altar in Bethel, and all the houses of the high places which were in the cities of Samaria”; this, said he, “shall surely come to pass.” And that there was repentance in the after-conduct of the old prophet; and that God was mercifully pleased to look upon it with a pitying eye, there is some ground for hope in the issue of the event, as it came to pass in God’s own time. For when Josiah had accomplished the Divine vengeance on all the abominations of Bethel; had deposed its priests, broken clown its high places, and defiled its altars; and was in the act of taking the dead from the sepulchres on the mount, and burning them on the altars of the former sin; we read that he religiously spared “the sepulchre of the man of God that came from Judah”; and that they let his bones alone, together with “the bones of the prophet that came cub of Samaria.” A signal act of mercy this, on a day of severe and general retribution!
Lessons:
1. I need scarcely say that this example directs its first and broadest rebuke against all such as would ever knowingly and wilfully oppose and pervert the truth. This is a species of guilt so monstrous and offensive in the eyes of God and man; so merely malicious in its whole drift, and policy, and endeavour; that one would think it needs only to be noted, to be at once shunned and abhorred. It was the first origin of all corruption and misery on the face of God’s pure and perfect creation; the cause of man’s degradation, and the cursing of the earth for his sake: by it “sin entered into the world, and death by sin.”
2. But further, there is a modification of the old prophet’s sin, into which we may sometimes fall, without at all going to its full extent. We are apt to be enamoured of our own particular views of what we are pleased to think is truth; to cherish these, and to propagate these, without sufficient warranty for their sound and solid foundation in what is right. (J. Puckle, M. A.)
The grave and its epitaph
“Bury me,” said the remorseful old man to his sons standing in tears around his miserable death-bed, “bury me in the same grave with the bones of the man of God out of Judah.” And the old prophet’s sons so buried their father. And an awful grave that was in Bethel, with an awful epitaph upon it. Now, suppose this Suppose that you were buried on the same awful principle--in whose grave would your bones lie waiting together with his till the last trump to stand forth before God and man together? And what would your epitaph and his be? Would it be this: “Here lie the liar and his victim “? Or would it be this: “Here lie the seducer and the seduced”? Or would it be this: “Here lie the hater and him he hated down to death”? Or would it be this: “ Here lie the tempting host and his too willing to be tempted guest”? Or, if you are a minister, would it be this: “Here lies a dumb dog, and beside him one who was a crowded preacher in the morning of his days, but a castaway before night”? Alas, my brother. (A. Whyte, D. D.)