Esther 1 - Clarke's commentary and critical notes on the Bible

Bible Comments
  • Esther 1:1 open_in_new

    Now it came to pass in the days of Ahasuerus, (this is Ahasuerus which reigned, from India even unto Ethiopia, over an hundred and seven and twenty provinces:) Now it came to pass - The Ahasuerus of the Romans, the Artaxerxes of the Greeks and Ardsheer of the Persians, are the same. Some think that this Ahasuerus was Darius, the son of Hystaspes; but Prideaux and others maintain that he was Artaxerxes Longimanus.

    Reigned from India even unto Ethiopia - This is nearly the same account that is given by Xenophon. How great and glorious the kingdom of Cyrus was beyond all the kingdoms of Asia, was evident from this: Ὡρισθῃ μεν πρως ἑῳ τῃ Ερυθρᾳ θαλαττῃ· προς αρκτον δε τῳ Ευξεινῳ ποντῳ· προς ἑσπεραν δε Κυπρῳ και Αιγυπτῳ· προς μεσημβριαν δε Αιθιοπιᾳ. "It was bounded on the east by the Red Sea; on the north by the Euxine Sea; on the west by Cyprus and Egypt; and on the south by Ethiopia." - Cyrop. lib. viii., p. 241, edit. Steph. 1581.

  • Esther 1:2 open_in_new

    That in those days, when the king Ahasuerus sat on the throne of his kingdom, which was in Shushan the palace, Sat on the throne of his kingdom - Having subdued all his enemies, and brought universal peace to his empire. See the commencement of the introduction.

    Shushan the palace - The ancient city of Susa, now called Shuster by the Persians. This, with Ecbatana and Babylon, was a residence of the Persian kings. The word הבירה habbirah, which we render the palace, should be rendered the city, εν Σουσοις τῃ πολει, as in the Septuagint.

  • Esther 1:3 open_in_new

    In the third year of his reign, he made a feast unto all his princes and his servants; the power of Persia and Media, the nobles and princes of the provinces, being before him:

  • Esther 1:4 open_in_new

    When he shewed the riches of his glorious kingdom and the honour of his excellent majesty many days, even an hundred and fourscore days. The riches of his glorious kingdom - Luxury was the characteristic of the Eastern monarchs, and particularly of the Persians. In their feasts, which were superb and of long continuance, they made a general exhibition of their wealth, grandeur, etc., and received the highest encomiums from their poets and flatterers. Their ostentation on such occasions passed into a proverb: hence Horace: -

    Persicos odi, puer, apparatus:

    Displicent nexae philyra coronae;

    Mitte sectari, rosa quo locorum

    Sera moretur.

    I tell thee, boy, that Idetest

    The grandeur of a Persian feast;

    Nor for me the linden's rind

    Shall the flowery chaplet bind.

    Then search not where the curious rose

    Beyond his season loitering grows.

    Francis.

  • Esther 1:5 open_in_new

    And when these days were expired, the king made a feast unto all the people that were present in Shushan the palace, both unto great and small, seven days, in the court of the garden of the king's palace; A feast unto all the people - The first was a feast for the nobles in general; this, for the people of the city at large.

    In the court of the garden - As the company was very numerous that was to be received, no apartments in the palace could be capable of containing them; therefore the court of the garden was chosen.

  • Esther 1:6 open_in_new

    Where were white, green, and blue, hangings, fastened with cords of fine linen and purple to silver rings and pillars of marble: the beds were of gold and silver, upon a pavement of red, and blue, and white, and black, marble. White, green, and blue hangings - It was customary, on such occasions, not only to hang the place about with elegant curtains of the above colors, as Dr. Shaw and others have remarked, but also to have a canopy of rich stuffs suspended on cords from side to side of the place in which they feasted. And such courts were ordinarily paved with different coloured marbles, or with tiles painted, as above specified. And this was the origin of the Musive or Mosaic work, well known among the Asiatics, and borrowed from them by the Greeks and the Romans.

    The beds of gold and silver mentioned here were the couches covered with gold and silver cloth, on which the guests reclined.

  • Esther 1:7 open_in_new

    And they gave them drink in vessels of gold, (the vessels being diverse one from another,) and royal wine in abundance, according to the state of the king. Vessels being diverse - They had different services of plate.

  • Esther 1:8 open_in_new

    And the drinking was according to the law; none did compel: for so the king had appointed to all the officers of his house, that they should do according to every man's pleasure. None did compel: for so the king had appointed - Every person drank what he pleased; he was not obliged to take more than he had reason to think would do him good.

    Among the Greeks, each guest was obliged to keep the round, or leave the company: hence the proverb Η πιθι, η απιθι; Drink or begone. To this Horace refers, but gives more license: -

    Pasco libatis dapibus; prout cuique libido est.

    Siccat inaequales calices conviva, solutus

    Legibus insanis: seu quis capit acria fortis

    Pocula; seu modicis humescit aetius.

    Horat. Sat. lib. ii., s. vi., ver. 67.

    There, every guest may drink and fill

    As much or little as he will;

    Exempted from the Bedlam rules

    Of roaring prodigals and fools.

    Whether, in merry mood or whim,

    He fills his goblet to the brim;

    Or, better pleased to let it pass,

    Is cheerful with a moderate glass.

    Francis.

    At the Roman feasts there was a person chosen by the cast of dice, who was the Arbiter bibendi, and prescribed rules to the company, which all were obliged to observe. References to this custom may be seen in the same poet. Odar. lib. i., Od. iv., ver. 18: -

    Non regna vini sortiere talis.

    And in lib. ii., Od. vii., ver. 25: -

    - Quem Venus arbitrum Dicet bibendi?

    Mr. Herbert, in his excellent poem, The Church Porch, has five verses on this vile custom and its rule: -

    Drink not the third glass, which thou canst not tame

    When once it is within thee, but before

    Mayst rule it as thou list; and pour the shame,

    Which it would pour on thee, upon the floor.

    It is most just to throw that on the ground,

    Which would throw me there if I keep the round.

    He that is drunken may his mother kill,

    Big with his sister; he hath lost the reins;

    Is outlawed by himself. All kinds of ill

    Did with his liquor slide into his veins.

    The drunkard forfeits man; and doth divest

    All worldly right, save what he hath by beast.

    Nothing too severe can be said on this destructive practice.

  • Esther 1:9 open_in_new

    Also Vashti the queen made a feast for the women in the royal house which belonged to king Ahasuerus. Also Vashti the queen - Vashti is a mere Persian word; and signifies a beautiful or excellent woman.

    Made a feast for the women - The king, having subdued all his enemies, left no competitor for the kingdom; and being thus quietly and firmly seated on the throne, made this a time of general festivity. As the women of the East never mingle with the men in public, Vashti made a feast for the Persian ladies by themselves; and while the men were in the court of the garden, the women were in the royal house.

  • Esther 1:10 open_in_new

    On the seventh day, when the heart of the king was merry with wine, he commanded Mehuman, Biztha, Harbona, Bigtha, and Abagtha, Zethar, and Carcas, the seven chamberlains that served in the presence of Ahasuerus the king, He commanded Mehuman - All these are doubtless Persian names; but so disguised by passing through a Hebrew medium, that some of them can scarcely be known. Mehuman signifies a stranger or guest.

    We shall find other names and words in this book, the Persian etymology of which may be easily traced.

  • Esther 1:11 open_in_new

    To bring Vashti the queen before the king with the crown royal, to shew the people and the princes her beauty: for she was fair to look on. To bring Vashti the queen - The Targum adds naked.

    For she was fair to look on - Hence she had her name Vashti, which signifies beautiful. See Esther 1:9.

  • Esther 1:12 open_in_new

    But the queen Vashti refused to come at the king's commandment by his chamberlains: therefore was the king very wroth, and his anger burned in him. Vashti refused to come - And much should she be commended for it. What woman, possessing even a common share of prudence and modesty, could consent to expose herself to the view of such a group of drunken Bacchanalians? Her courage was equal to her modesty: she would resist the royal mandate, rather than violate the rules of chaste decorum.

    Her contempt of worldly grandeur, when brought in competition with what every modest woman holds dear and sacred, is worthy of observation. She well knew that this act of disobedience would cost her her crown, if not her life also: but she was regardless of both, as she conceived her virtue and honor were at stake.

    Her humility was greatly evidenced in this refusal. She was beautiful; and might have shown herself to great advantage, and have had a fine opportunity of gratifying her vanity, if she had any: but she refused to come.

    Hail, noble woman! be thou a pattern to all thy sex on every similar occasion! Surely, every thing considered, we have few women like Vashti; for some of the highest of the land will dress and deck themselves with the utmost splendor, even to the selvedge of their fortunes, to exhibit themselves at balls, plays, galas, operas, and public assemblies of all kinds, (nearly half naked), that they may be seen and admired of men, and even, to the endless reproach and broad suspicion of their honor and chastity, figure away in masquerades! Vashti must be considered at the top of her sex: -

    Rara avis in terris, nigroque simillima cygno.

    A black swan is not half so rare a bird.

  • Esther 1:13 open_in_new

    Then the king said to the wise men, which knew the times, (for so was the king's manner toward all that knew law and judgment: To the wise men - Probably the lawyers.

  • Esther 1:14 open_in_new

    And the next unto him was Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, the seven princes of Persia and Media, which saw the king's face, and which sat the first in the kingdom;) And the next unto him - the seven princes - Probably, the privy counsellors of the king. Which saw the king's face - were at all times admitted to the royal presence.

  • Esther 1:15 open_in_new

    What shall we do unto the queen Vashti according to law, because she hath not performed the commandment of the king Ahasuerus by the chamberlains?

  • Esther 1:16 open_in_new

    And Memucan answered before the king and the princes, Vashti the queen hath not done wrong to the king only, but also to all the princes, and to all the people that are in all the provinces of the king Ahasuerus. Vashti - hath not done wrong to the king only - This reasoning or arguing was inconsequent and false. Vashti had not generally disobeyed the king, therefore she could be no precedent for the general conduct of the Persian women. She disobeyed only in one particular; and this, to serve a purpose, Memucan draws into a general consequence; and the rest came to the conclusion which he drew, being either too drunk to be able to discern right from wrong, or too intent on reducing the women to a state of vassalage, to neglect the present favorable opportunity.

  • Esther 1:17 open_in_new

    For this deed of the queen shall come abroad unto all women, so that they shall despise their husbands in their eyes, when it shall be reported, The king Ahasuerus commanded Vashti the queen to be brought in before him, but she came not.

  • Esther 1:18 open_in_new

    Likewise shall the ladies of Persia and Media say this day unto all the king's princes, which have heard of the deed of the queen. Thus shall there arise too much contempt and wrath. The ladies of Persia - שרות saroth, the princesses; but the meaning is very well expressed by our term ladies.

  • Esther 1:19 open_in_new

    If it please the king, let there go a royal commandment from him, and let it be written among the laws of the Persians and the Medes, that it be not altered, That Vashti come no more before king Ahasuerus; and let the king give her royal estate unto another that is better than she. That it be not altered - Let it be inserted among the permanent laws, and made a part of the constitution of the empire. Perhaps the Persians affected such a degree of wisdom in the construction of their laws, that they never could be amended, and should never be repeated. And this we may understand to be the ground of the saying, The laws of the Medes and Persians, that change not.

  • Esther 1:20 open_in_new

    And when the king's decree which he shall make shall be published throughout all his empire, (for it is great,) all the wives shall give to their husbands honour, both to great and small.

  • Esther 1:21 open_in_new

    And the saying pleased the king and the princes; and the king did according to the word of Memucan:

  • Esther 1:22 open_in_new

    For he sent letters into all the king's provinces, into every province according to the writing thereof, and to every people after their language, that every man should bear rule in his own house, and that it should be published according to the language of every people. That every man should bear rule in his own house - Both God's law and common sense taught this from the foundation of the world. And is it possible that this did not obtain in the Persian empire, previously to this edict? The twentieth verse has another clause, That all wives shall give to their husbands honor, both to great and small. This also was universally understood. This law did nothing. I suppose the parade of enactment was only made to deprive honest Vashti of her crown. The Targum adds, "That each woman should speak the language of her husband." If she were even a foreigner, she should be obliged to learn and speak the language of the king. Perhaps there might be some common sense in this, as it would oblige the foreigner to devote much time to study and improvement; and, consequently, to make her a better woman, and a better wife. But there is no proof that this was a part of the decree. But there are so many additions to this book in the principal versions, that we know not what might have made a part of it originally.

    Commentary on the Bible, by Adam Clarke [1831].