Ezra 2 - Clarke's commentary and critical notes on the Bible

Bible Comments
  • Ezra 2:1 open_in_new

    Now these are the children of the province that went up out of the captivity, of those which had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away unto Babylon, and came again unto Jerusalem and Judah, every one unto his city; These are the children of the province - That is, of Judea; once a kingdom, and a flourishing nation; now a province, subdued, tributary, and ruined! Behold the goodness and severity of God! Some think Babylon is meant by the province; and that the children of the province means those Jews who were born in Babylon. But the first is most likely to be the meaning, for thus we find Judea styled, Ezra 5:8. Besides, the province is contradistinguished from Babylon even in this first verse, The children of the province - that had been carried away unto Babylon.

  • Ezra 2:2 open_in_new

    Which came with Zerubbabel: Jeshua, Nehemiah, Seraiah, Reelaiah, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispar, Bigvai, Rehum, Baanah. The number of the men of the people of Israel: Which came with Zerubbabel - There are many difficulties in this table of names; but as we have no less than three copies of it, that contained here from Ezra 2:1-67, a second in Nehemiah 7:6-69, and a third in 1 Esdras 5:7-43, on a careful examination they will be found to correct each other. The versions also, and the Variae Lectiones of Kennicott and De Rossi, do much toward harmonizing the names.

    Though the sum total at the end of each of these enumerations is equal, namely 42,360, yet the particulars reckoned up make in Ezra only 29,818, and in Nehemiah 31,089. We find that Nehemiah mentions 1765 persons which are not in Ezra, and Ezra has 494 not mentioned by Nehemiah. Mr. Alting thinks that this circumstance, which appears to render all hope of reconciling them impossible, is precisely the very point by which they can be reconciled; for if we add Ezra's surplus to the sum in Nehemiah, and the surplus of Nehemiah to the number in Ezra, the numbers will be equal.

    Thus: -

    The number in Ezra 29,818 Surplus in Nehemiah 1,765 Sum total 31,583

    The number in Nehemiah 31,089 The surplus in Ezra 494 Sum total 31,583

    If we subtract this sum 31,583 from 42,360, we shall have a deficiency of 10,777 from the numbers as summed up in the text; and these are not named here, either because their registers were not found, or they were not of Judah and Benjamin, the tribes particularly concerned, but of the other Israelitish tribes; see Ezra 2:36.

  • Ezra 2:3 open_in_new

    The children of Parosh, two thousand an hundred seventy and two. The children of Parosh - Where the word children is found in this table, prefixed to the name of a man, it signifies the descendants of that person, as from Ezra 2:3-21. Where it is found prefixed to a place, town, etc., it signifies the inhabitants of that place, as from Ezra 2:21-35.

  • Ezra 2:6 open_in_new

    The children of Pahathmoab, of the children of Jeshua and Joab, two thousand eight hundred and twelve.

  • Ezra 2:21 open_in_new

    The children of Bethlehem, an hundred twenty and three. The children of Beth-lehem - The inhabitants: see before.

  • Ezra 2:33 open_in_new

    The children of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, seven hundred twenty and five. The children of Lod, Hadid, and Ono - These were cities in the tribe of Benjamin; see on 1 Chronicles 8:12 (note).

  • Ezra 2:36 open_in_new

    The priests: the children of Jedaiah, of the house of Jeshua, nine hundred seventy and three. The priests - The preceding list takes in the census of Judah and Benjamin.

  • Ezra 2:40 open_in_new

    The Levites: the children of Jeshua and Kadmiel, of the children of Hodaviah, seventy and four.

  • Ezra 2:42 open_in_new

    The children of the porters: the children of Shallum, the children of Ater, the children of Talmon, the children of Akkub, the children of Hatita, the children of Shobai, in all an hundred thirty and nine.

  • Ezra 2:55 open_in_new

    The children of Solomon's servants: the children of Sotai, the children of Sophereth, the children of Peruda, The children of Solomon's servants - The Nethinim, and others appointed to do the meaner services of the holy house.

  • Ezra 2:57 open_in_new

    The children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth of Zebaim, the children of Ami.

  • Ezra 2:58 open_in_new

    All the Nethinims, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.

  • Ezra 2:59 open_in_new

    And these were they which went up from Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan, and Immer: but they could not shew their father's house, and their seed, whether they were of Israel:

  • Ezra 2:60 open_in_new

    The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobiah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred fifty and two.

  • Ezra 2:61 open_in_new

    And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name:

  • Ezra 2:62 open_in_new

    These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood.

  • Ezra 2:63 open_in_new

    And the Tirshatha said unto them, that they should not eat of the most holy things, till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim. The Tirshatha - This is generally supposed to be Nehemiah, or the person who was the commandant; see Nehemiah 8:9; Nehemiah 10:1, for the word appears to be the name of an office. The Vulgate and Septuagint write it Atershatha, the Syriac and Arabic render it the princes of Judah. Some suppose the word to be Persian, but nothing like it of the same import occurs in that language at present. If, as Castel supposed, it signifies austerity, or that fear which is unpressed by the authority of a governor, it may come from ters, Fear, or tersh, Acid, the former from tarsidan, to Fear or Dread.

    Should not eat of the most holy things - There was a high priest then, but no Urim and Thummim, these having been lost in the captivity.

  • Ezra 2:65 open_in_new

    Beside their servants and their maids, of whom there were seven thousand three hundred thirty and seven: and there were among them two hundred singing men and singing women.

  • Ezra 2:66 open_in_new

    Their horses were seven hundred thirty and six; their mules, two hundred forty and five; Their horses - seven hundred, etc. - They went into captivity, stripped of every thing; they now return from it, abounding in the most substantial riches, viz., horses 736, or, according to Esdras, 7036; mules, 245; camels, 435; asses, 6720; besides gold, and silver, and rich stuffs. See below.

  • Ezra 2:67 open_in_new

    Their camels, four hundred thirty and five; their asses, six thousand seven hundred and twenty.

  • Ezra 2:68 open_in_new

    And some of the chief of the fathers, when they came to the house of the LORD which is at Jerusalem, offered freely for the house of God to set it up in his place:

  • Ezra 2:69 open_in_new

    They gave after their ability unto the treasure of the work threescore and one thousand drams of gold, and five thousand pound of silver, and one hundred priests' garments. Threescore and one thousand drams of gold - דרכמונים darkemonim, drakmons or darics; a Persian coin, always of gold, and worth about 1. 5s., not less than 76,250 sterling in gold.

    Five thousand pounds of silver - מנים manim, manehs or minas. As a weight, the maneh was 100 shekels; as a coin, 60 shekels in value, or about 9.; 5000 of these manehs therefore will amount to 45,000, making in the whole a sum of about 120,000; and in this are not included the 100 garments for priests.

    Thus we find that God, in the midst of judgment, remembered mercy, and gave them favor in the land of their captivity.

  • Ezra 2:70 open_in_new

    So the priests, and the Levites, and some of the people, and the singers, and the porters, and the Nethinims, dwelt in their cities, and all Israel in their cities. Dwelt in their cities - They all went to those cities which belonged originally to their respective families.

    Commentary on the Bible, by Adam Clarke [1831].