Let us read the character of modern hostility to Christianity in that of Sennacherib and his marshals.
I. The first thing which attracts our notice is their boastful-ness. The Assyrian monarch evidently had no mean opinion of himself. "Know ye not," he says, "what I and my fathers have done?" Self-conceit is the most obvious quality of the enemies of God.
II. A second quality by which this kind of hostility to religion is characterized is its special animosity to the ministers of the Gospel. It is noticeable that the Assyrian does not address his appeal chiefly to the Judaean king and his official representatives. His attempt is to stir up revolt among the populace, by appeals to their superstition and their fears. So now the people are exhorted to revolt against "the priests." The popular name which infidelity gives to Christianity is priestcraft.
III. Avowed enmity to religion is often characterized also by the plausibility of its reasonings against the destiny of Christianity. Much can be plausibly said against religion and its friends. Facts can be made to seem conclusive against them. The confident predictions of the downfall of Christianity often seem morally certain.
IV. The history of the avowed enemies of Christ is characterized by the certainty, the suddenness, and the unexpected means of their disappointment. Somebody made very short work with Sennacherib. One night was time enough to answer his gasconade against the people of God. One angel of the Lord was a match for the Assyrian battalions. The history of our religion develops often a similar phenomenon in God's dealings with His enemies. They are sure to be disappointed in the result. Something keeps Christianity alive today, centuries after, by the logic of its foes, it ought to have been dead and buried. It never had a deeper hold upon the world's faith than now. Never before did its friends look out upon a more resplendent future.
A. Phelps, The Old Testament a Living Book,p. 147.
Reference: 2 Chronicles 31:20; 2 Chronicles 31:21. Christian World Pulpit,vol. xiii., p. 52.